Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Letter: Nanny state denies us personal choice

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

How did we ever survive the 1920s, ’30s and ’40s? Asbestos was everywhere – considered to be a miracle building material with other industrial uses such as ship building and brake lining. And lead from leaded paint, leaded gasoline, leaded plumbing. And second-hand smoke.

The visibility in most bars was less than 30 feet and restaurants were not far behind. Even TV was a little murky when Edward R. Murrow or Dean Martin were showing.

There were no endangered-species folks around to protect us from misguidedly building a lot of dams and reservoirs, and consequently, trampling on important bugs and rodents. We didn’t realize they were more valuable than water, recreation and flood protection. We recklessly rode across country without seat belts. I was recently ticketed for driving in broad daylight with lights off – a “moving violation” like speeding. Today, the nanny state is alive and well.

We did not have McDonald’s to sue when we got fat or spilled hot coffee on ourselves. We just tried to learn and do better. We didn’t have armies of lawyers to protect us from ourselves. If someone were injured on our property, he/she would apologize for doing something stupid and head to a doctor instead of an attorney. No one felt the need to carry expensive insurance. The public beaches had diving towers. Folks who wanted to live on the edge, could do so – at their own peril.

Of course, there is a price for all this protection. Our nephew, a successful orthopedic surgeon, said he would never go into medicine again. He said, “It’s just no fun since the lawyers took over.”  He counseled his son not to enter medicine. One wonders how much talent is lost to us because of our litigious society. I’m glad we didn’t know about the dangers that were lurking around us in our youth – the stress would have been unbearable – and made worse by not having anyone to sue.


Dean Munson

Yuba City


See archived 'Letters' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We welcome comments from registered users of our Web site. (If you're not registered, click here.) We ask that users exercise good judgment and tolerate other people's views. Your comments should be free of libel, profanity, personal attacks and racist or offensive language. Inappropriate content will be removed without notice. Repeat violators of our user agreement will be barred from making future comments.

Weather
Traffic
News Alerts
For complete
Yuba-Sutter
weather details
click here
ADVERTISEMENT 
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Games
Puzzles
BACK TO SCHOOL?
The new GI Bill benefits vary from state to state depending on tuition and fees, replacing the previous flat stipend, and also includes a formula for private college assistance. Do you agree with this approach?
Yes, it allows veterans more choices of where to attend college.
I like it, but the private school policy is flawed in California.
I think it's too generous.
No, it pits states against each other.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site
  • Help
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Subscriber Services