Letter: Gay marriage ruling criticized

Now that the "activist judge" ruled that so called gay marriage to now be legal and constitutional, we should all capitulate to his all wise decision.

Hmm, I wonder: How he might rule if a man or woman wanted to marry his or her dog, cat, horse, cow or any other animal of their choice? Suppose a man or woman wanted to marry two others, rather than just one. Suppose a man wanted a wife and a husband at the same time.What would be wrong if a gay person wanted to marry his sister, brother, mother or father?

I could go on and on about marital situations that are now violations of law. When is this insanity going to cease?

Ron Reavis
Sutter