Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Nitrates nag city

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Live Oak reduces work on water

Live Oak is scaling back its arsenic removal project after high nitrate levels were found in one of five city wells.

The additional treatment required to bring the well up to standards cannot be covered by $2 million in grants the city received to fix the arsenic problems, Public Works Director Michael Bohlander told the City Council on Wednesday night.

The council unanimously voted to negotiate with the low bidder for the five-well treatment project - Waterworks Construction Inc. - for a four-well job.

“Early indications are they’re OK with that,” Bohlander said of the contractor.

The project was spurred by the tightening of arsenic levels in drinking water by the Environmental Protection Agency in January 2006 from 50 parts per billion to 10 ppb, an amount a city consultant said equaled a drop of water in a pool.

Live Oak’s drinking water averages 20 to 30 ppb, a level not considered a major health problem. The city has until September 2008 to comply with the federal standards.

The city applied for funds on an arsenic treatment program through Proposition 40, approved by state voters in 2002. Of $9.5 million in arsenic reduction money available statewide, Live Oak received $2 million.

Bids for treating five wells with a filtration system from seven companies ranged from $3.52 million to $2.6 million. Estimates earlier this year had the project being fully funded by the $2 million grant.

“I about passed out reading those numbers,” Bohlander said.

Then came the nitrate discovery, which forced City Well 5 to be taken offline entirely.

While numbers are not official, Bohlander said taking the fifth well out of the project will bring the contract down to around $2.1 million.

Bohlander said even with the lower number, $2.5 million is the target cost for repairs. The grant is not in danger because of the project change.

The city applied Tuesday for a different grant to correct the problems with Well 5 through Proposition 84, the 2006 measure which approved $5.4 billion in bond funding for water supply, flood and other natural resource issues.

“Hopefully, we’ll be able to get that grant to get back to five wells again,” Bohlander said.

Appeal-Democrat reporter Robert LaHue can be reached at 749-4713. You may e-mail him at rlahue@appealdemocrat.com.


See archived 'Local News' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We welcome comments from registered users of our Web site. (If you're not registered, click here.) We ask that users exercise good judgment and tolerate other people's views. Your comments should be free of libel, profanity, personal attacks and racist or offensive language. Inappropriate content will be removed without notice. Repeat violators of our user agreement will be barred from making future comments.

Weather
Traffic
News Alerts
For complete
Yuba-Sutter
weather details
click here
ADVERTISEMENT 
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Games
Puzzles
BACK TO SCHOOL?
The new GI Bill benefits vary from state to state depending on tuition and fees, replacing the previous flat stipend, and also includes a formula for private college assistance. Do you agree with this approach?
Yes, it allows veterans more choices of where to attend college.
I like it, but the private school policy is flawed in California.
I think it's too generous.
No, it pits states against each other.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site
  • Help
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Subscriber Services