Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size

Other Articles in this Category

  • 1 hour 7 minutes ago
  • 3 hours 24 minutes ago
  • 3 hours 46 minutes ago
  • 1 hour 38 minutes ago
  • What is this?

    Save & Share this Article

    No stopping growth in Yuba

    Comments 0 | Recommend 0

    County supervisors reviewing issues for 20-year general plan update

    Growth is coming to Yuba County. When it comes, the Board of Supervisors wants development to be organized and focused.

    “Growth is going to be in the south county because it’s closer to jobs,” Supervisor Mary Jane Griego said Thursday. “I think we need to finish and perfect what we have there. We need schools, retail and medical resources there. We need to plan and focus on an area before moving on to the next.”

    This consensus came out of the first of four study sessions relating to the county’s general plan update.

    “We are not going to stop any of the growth. What this plan does is manage it, we need to smart manage,” Griego said.

    The county is working on updating its general plan for the next 20 years.

    County officials expect the population to nearly double, based on Sacramento Area Council of Governments and state Department of Finance projections. Yuba County’s current population is roughly 70,745.

    Supervisor Hal Stocker noted that with growth, regardless of where it is, there is still the obligation of providing public safety.

    “We do have to protect the people that are already behind the levees,” he said. “My feeling is that growth in the flood areas depends on how we do with the levee repairs.”

    County Project Planner Dan Cucchi said flood protection was a topic largely discussed by citizens during town hall meetings on the update.

    “They wanted to avoid flood-threatened areas and said 200-year protection of the levees was very important,” Cucchi said.

    Supervisor Don Schrader, however, said Yuba County could build out of the floodplain.

    “Unlike our neighbors across the river, we have a choice to not build in a floodplain,” he said. “I think we should look carefully at where we want future development to be even with the levees fixed.”

    Supervisor John Nicoletti said traffic is also a growth-related issue.

    “Roads and traffic will continue to be impacted, and we need to deal with those,” he said. “We don’t have $150 million (for a bypass), but will we continue to cripple our infrastructure with oversized trucks or will we deal with the issue?”

    Supervisors also addressed growth in industry in addition to population.

    “I think it’s worth looking into setting aside land for an industrial site,” Supervisor Dan Logue said. “The key to this county’s future is bringing jobs to the county.”

    WHAT'S NEXT

    Yuba County supervisors will hold a second study session to discuss sewage, water and other infrastructure at 2 p.m. Jan. 10 in the board chambers, County Government Center, 915 Eighth St., Marysville.

    Appeal-Democrat reporter Andrea Koskey can be reached at 749-4709 or at akoskey@appealdemocrat.com


    See archived 'Local News' stories »
     


    Reader Comments
    We welcome comments from registered users of our Web site. (If you're not registered, click here.) We ask that users exercise good judgment and tolerate other people's views. Your comments should be free of libel, profanity, personal attacks and racist or offensive language. Inappropriate content will be removed without notice. Repeat violators of our user agreement will be barred from making future comments.

    Weather
    Traffic
    News Alerts
    For complete
    Yuba-Sutter
    weather details
    click here
    ADVERTISEMENT 
    Featured Events

     
    • Find an Event
    Publish Your Stuff
    ADVERTISEMENT 
    Poll
    Games
    Puzzles
    BACK TO SCHOOL?
    The new GI Bill benefits vary from state to state depending on tuition and fees, replacing the previous flat stipend, and also includes a formula for private college assistance. Do you agree with this approach?
    Yes, it allows veterans more choices of where to attend college.
    I like it, but the private school policy is flawed in California.
    I think it's too generous.
    No, it pits states against each other.
    Enter The Code To Vote
     
    powered by
    google
    Search
            Search: Web    Site
    • Help
    • Site Map
    • Contact Us
    • Subscriber Services